Santiago Rodriguez Taverna vs Daniel Michalski Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 09 Jul at 12:24 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
S. Rodriguez Taverna vs D. Michalski

ARG
2
Win
Played
0
Win

POL
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Taverna 2 - 0 Michalski
They have played 4 sets in total, with Santiago Rodriguez Taverna winning 4 and Daniel Michalski winning 0. The last match between Santiago Rodriguez Taverna and Daniel Michalski was at the Trieste Challenger, 09-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Santiago Rodriguez Taverna getting the victory 7-5 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Taverna | 2 |
| Michalski | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R1) Trieste Challenger(07-09-25)
(Q3) Braga Challenger(09-20-21)
S. R. Taverna vs D. Michalski H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $128,000 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 58.28% (366-262) | Career Total W/L | 62.91% (290-171) |
| 2 | Clay | 0 |
| 9 | Titles | 15 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
S. R. Taverna vs D. Michalski Match Preview:
- In recent performance, Taverna shows a slight edge in second serve points, winning 46.82% compared to Michalski's 43.66%.
- How do they fare in returns? Taverna leads here too, with 46.86% of points won on opponents' second serves, against Michalski's 43.35%.
- Both players are closely matched in first-serve returns, with Taverna at 30.64% and Michalski at 30.16%.
- Who's better under pressure? Taverna saves 54.12% of breakpoints, outperforming Michalski, who saves 47.35%.
- Over the past year, Michalski has had a higher win percentage, securing 65.75% wins compared to Taverna's 59.14%.
- Both players show distinct surface preferences; Taverna excels on Hard courts, and Michalski's strength lies in Clay courts.
- Which level of competition have they faced more? Taverna competes at Challengers/ITF, whereas Michalski's presence is stronger at Futures/Satellites/ITF events.
- In direct encounters, Taverna leads with one decisive win over Michalski.
- The quality of opponents? Taverna's opponents have been slightly higher ranked than Michalski's.
- In all matches, Michalski has a slight edge in deciding set wins at 70% compared to Taverna's 65%.
- The breakpoint conversion sees Michalski with an advantage, converting 35.11% of opportunities, as opposed to Taverna's 32.73%.
Editorial Prediction (July 9, 2025, UTC):
As we examine the upcoming match between Taverna and Michalski, both players possess specific strengths that present interesting contrasts. Taverna has shown consistent second-serve resilience and returning success, which could prove pivotal against Michalski.
Despite Taverna's favorable head-to-head record, Michalski's overall better win percentage over the last year and strong conversion of break points cannot be overlooked. Michalski's performance in deciding sets is also a strong area, potentially giving him an edge if the match is closely contested.
Factoring in all the statistics and recent performances, Michalski emerges as the slight favorite to win this match, but Taverna's potential strength on hard surfaces and head-to-head success keeps the prediction competitive. Nevertheless, Michalski is likely to come out on top based on the recent trends and cumulative data.
Santiago Rodriguez Taverna vs Daniel Michalski Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
S. R. Taverna vs D. Michalski H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 25 | Games Won | 12 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:19:38 | Average Match Time | 1:19:38 |
| 61% (66/109) | 1st Serve % | 55% (65/119) |
| 68% (45/66) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (34/65) |
| 51% (22/43) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (21/54) |
| 52% (11/21) | Break Pts Won % | 57% (4/7) |
| 54% (64/119) | Return Points Win % | 39% (42/109) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
S. R. Taverna Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||
QF | L | 6-7(6) 6-2 6-2 | ||
R2 | W | 6-4 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-1 6-4 | ||
F | L | 6-1 6-4 | ||
D. Michalski Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SF | L | 6-3 ret. | ||
QF | W | 7-5 3-6 6-2 | ||
R2 | W | 6-3 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 6-1 6-4 | ||
F | L | 7-6(5) 7-5 | ||

S. R. Taverna vs D. Michalski Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.28% (366/262) | YTD Win/Loss | 62.91% (290/171) |
| 55.35% (823/664) | Sets Win/Loss | 60.46% (636/416) |
| 51.42% (7327/6922) | Games Win/Loss | 54.14% (5189/4395) |
| 62.34% (96/58) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.00% (33/33) |
| 57.39% (268/199) | Clay Win/Loss | 65.63% (252/132) |
| 25.00% (1/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 45.45% (5/6) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 1661 | Aces Total | 648 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 1488 | Total Double Faults | 904 |
| 1:42:20 | Average Match Time | 1:49:11 |
| 432.96 | Average Opponent Rank | 504.68 |
| 62% (26030/42118) | 1st Serve % | 61% (18392/30109) |
| 66% (17277/26030) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (11932/18392) |
| 50% (7985/16088) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (6058/11717) |
| 41% (1808/4378) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1740/3650) |
| 40% (16998/41983) | Return Points Win % | 44% (13506/30484) |
| 46.67% (7/8) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/5) |
| 51.39% (129/122) | Challenger W/L | 49.09% (81/84) |
| 63.89% (230/130) | Futures W/L | 71.97% (208/81) |
| 58% (358/616) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (286/452) |
| 50% (4/8) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (110/198) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 66% (65/98) |
| 60% (135/226) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (79/139) |
| 87% (340/295) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (285/250) |
| 13% (340/44) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (285/34) |
| 24% (288/69) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (176/39) |